What was it patterned on? At the time I didn't know it, but it was Smalltalk. More on that can be found in this article about the Lisa (remember that Macintosh?)
A few years ago I was in a group at OOPLSA with Dan Ingalls when the above topic was raised. Dan pointed out that Jobs had complained at that particular meeting about the jerky line by line scrolling of text windows. Dan then proceeded to alter the Smalltalk image to provide pixel scrolling, and showed it to Jobs. Alas, Jobs never realized that this simple change actually altered the behavior of all the windows in the system. I believe that if Jobs had understood that, we would have learned Smalltalk for the Mac, versus Macintosh Pascal. Many people would say too big, too much memory! Go look at Pocket Smalltalk before you decide. A Chance meetingI had my chance to talk to Jobs too! In February of 1995 I gave a talk on Smalltalk as a programming language from a consultant's viewpoint at the Client/Server Convention & Exposition in San Jose. Three of us compared and contrasted technology. I won. The others agreed that Smalltalk was the better choice. More exciting was the fact that after the talk, I ran into Mr. Jobs and his team in the hallway. This was San Jose after all, and he had just being talking about NeXT computers in the room next door to me. I had the chance to buttonhole Mr. Jobs on What About Smalltalk? Alas, he said "Smalltalk was dead, NeXT step (now WebObjects) was the future". But wait!... Isn't NeXT step programmed with Objective-C? If you look at the documentation for Objective C, (lurks under coco now) you will find that it is modeled on Smalltalk! This short Objective-C example Althought Steve Jobs felt Smalltalk was dead, lessons learned from it were very much alive in his company! The more observant of you will have noticed, that my discussion regarding Smalltalk with Mr. Jobs took place in 1995. He obviously changed his mind, as was reported by the New York Times in 1997.
|